WNBA Starter Torches Sweeney Pile-On

Two women playing basketball; Michelle Jenneke is not visible
Photo: Alex Kravtsov / Shutterstock

A wave of outrage tried to shame Sydney Sweeney for a racy gambling ad — and WNBA guard Sophie Cunningham called out the overreaction, saying it was never about women’s sports.

Story Snapshot

  • Reports said the ad showed Sweeney nude or nearly nude with sports gear, fueling criticism from female athletes.
  • WNBA player Sophie Cunningham said backlash was overblown and the ad targeted male sports bettors, not women’s sports.
  • Cunningham called the campaign “inauthentic” but defended Sweeney personally and said, “Go do your thing, sis”.
  • Sweeney briefly lost large numbers of social followers amid the uproar, showing real visibility stakes.

What Sparked The Backlash Against The Ad

Major outlets reported that a Novig sports wagering ad showed actress Sydney Sweeney nude or minimally clothed, posed with footballs and other gear. That imagery drove a fast backlash from female athletes who said the spot sexualized women and disrespected women’s sports. Coverage by the Associated Press and Cable News Network detailed those complaints and described the visuals as “nude or minimally clad,” which set the tone for the dispute across social media and sports media.

The controversy spread well beyond a few angry posts. The New York Times, USA Today, and Deadline all covered the dust-up, describing both the sexualized visuals and the athlete response. The shared theme was simple: critics felt the ad reduced women to props to sell betting. That broad reporting made this a mainstream story, not just an online flare-up. It also created pressure on the brand and talent to explain what the ad was trying to do and whom it was for.

Sophie Cunningham’s Mixed But Clear Defense Of Sweeney

Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham weighed in on her podcast and in interviews. She argued the outrage went too far and asked why women were angry at Sweeney when the ad was aimed at men who bet on sports. She said the spot was not about women’s sports at all. That framing pushed back on the idea that Sweeney represented female athletes or their work. Cunningham still called the ad “inauthentic,” questioning whether Sweeney even bets, but she defended Sweeney as a person.

Cunningham added that the ad’s formula — men, sports, and a nearly nude woman — was made to get attention. She said moral discomfort with the execution did not mean Sweeney should be shamed for doing what she is known for. She closed with a live-and-let-live note: “Go do your thing, sis.” That stance separated the cultural debate about sex in ads from attacks on Sweeney herself. It pointed viewers back to the actual target market and the long use of sex to sell gambling products.

Real-World Impact And What We Still Do Not Know

USA Today reported that Sweeney briefly lost hundreds of thousands of Instagram followers as the controversy peaked, including sharp drops on September 13 and 14. That metric shows the cost of viral outrage even when a campaign is doing what marketers expect it to do — draw attention. The numbers underscored how fast reputations can take a hit in a news cycle fueled by social media engagement and celebrity reach.

Key facts remain limited. No reporting shows that the ad misled viewers about the product or broke advertising rules. The authenticity critique leans on whether Sweeney actually bets, which has not been proven either way. The brand has not released detailed creative briefs that would confirm intent. Without those records, claims about strategy stay broad. What is clear is that many athletes felt disrespected, while Cunningham argued the ad never claimed to speak for women’s sports.

Why This Matters To Conservative Readers

Culture warriors tried to turn one ad into a moral test and to shame a woman who chose to work on a legal product. Cunningham’s response cut through that noise. She kept the focus on personal choice, market reality, and common sense: the ad targeted adult male bettors, not young girls or women’s leagues. That reminder resists the mob and supports a core value — free adults making free choices — while leaving room for parents and fans to decide what they watch and support.

Sources:

nytimes.com, apnews.com, usatoday.com, cnn.com, sports.yahoo.com