Globalist Plot? Trump BLASTS UN Emissions Crackdown

Industrial plant emitting black smoke into the sky

Trump’s White House vows economic retaliation against nations supporting the UN’s global shipping “net-zero” plan, calling it a direct threat to American sovereignty and industry.

Story Snapshot

The US, under President Trump, has rejected the IMO’s net-zero shipping plan and warned of economic retaliation against supporting countries.
Conservative leaders denounce the plan as another globalist scheme threatening US jobs, constitutional authority, and supply chain security.
The new IMO regulations impose a binding fuel standard and carbon pricing, targeting net-zero emissions by 2050 for ships over 5,000 gross tons.
Industry and conservative experts warn these rules will increase costs, disrupt trade, and undermine national sovereignty in favor of unelected international bodies.

US Rejects IMO Net-Zero Shipping Mandate, Promises Retaliation

The Trump administration has made clear that the United States will not comply with the International Maritime Organization’s sweeping net-zero emissions mandate for global shipping, set to take effect in 2027. US officials argue that this UN-driven plan, which imposes mandatory global fuel standards and carbon pricing, is an affront to American sovereignty and a serious threat to the nation’s economic interests. President Trump’s team has promised to use tariffs, trade restrictions, and diplomatic measures against countries that back the IMO’s framework.

Conservative lawmakers and industry leaders point to the far-reaching consequences of the IMO’s regulations. The new rules will apply to ships over 5,000 gross tons—responsible for 85% of global shipping emissions—and enforce net-zero greenhouse gas targets by 2050. Many see this as setting a dangerous precedent: unelected international bodies dictating the terms of American commerce, jobs, and constitutional rights. Critics argue that such global mandates threaten to drive up costs, shrink the US merchant fleet, and hand strategic advantage to foreign competitors less willing to enforce costly climate policies.

Globalist Climate Agenda Faces Fierce American Pushback

Trump’s administration has framed the IMO’s regulations as part of a broader “globalist” agenda that seeks to erode US independence under the guise of fighting climate change. The White House released a joint statement declaring the so-called global carbon tax a direct attack on American jobs, energy security, and the constitutional authority of Congress to regulate commerce. Officials warn that the IMO’s approach is not only undemocratic but also threatens to undermine the world’s supply chains by increasing shipping costs and stifling investment in American maritime industries.

Industry experts add that these new standards could result in billions of dollars in annual costs for shipping companies, which will be passed on to American consumers through higher prices for everything from cars to groceries. Key shipping associations, while supporting clean technology, have cautioned that an abrupt, one-size-fits-all mandate risks destabilizing the global economy and punishing countries—like the US—that already lead in emissions reductions through innovation and efficiency, not foreign dictates.

International Backlash and the Stakes for American Values

Countries supporting the IMO plan, including many in Europe and Asia, now face the prospect of US retaliation. The Trump administration has hinted at targeted tariffs, restrictions on port access, and new bilateral agreements to bypass IMO rules. Conservative voices argue that this firm stance is necessary to defend American workers, constitutional principles, and the nation’s ability to set its own environmental standards. They warn that if left unchecked, the IMO’s net-zero drive could pave the way for similar international interventions in other sectors, threatening gun rights, family values, and the very foundation of American liberty.

US Vows to Retaliate Against Countries That Back Net-Zero Plan for Global Shipping https://t.co/zJTFXS9w1e via @epochtimes

— clutchkickers (@clutchkickers00) August 13, 2025

While some environmental groups and foreign governments hail the IMO’s action as a historic step for climate policy, many in the US see it as an overreach that ignores national interests and constitutional limits on global governance. With the world watching, the Trump administration’s promise to retaliate signals a new era of resistance to international climate mandates—one that puts American sovereignty, jobs, and values first, even as global institutions push for unprecedented regulatory control.