China and Russia Put on Notice

Waving American flag against a clear blue sky

A new policy threatens to revive an age-old doctrine, sparking debate over U.S. sovereignty and foreign entanglements.

Story Highlights

The Trump administration unveils a “Trump Corollary” to the Monroe Doctrine to counter China and Russia.
This new policy aims to deny non-hemispheric powers access to strategic assets in the Americas.
Critics argue it could lead to isolationism while supporters see it as a necessary defensive measure.

The Revival of the Monroe Doctrine

In 2025, the Trump administration introduced a “Trump Corollary” to the Monroe Doctrine as part of its National Security Strategy. This modern adaptation aims to prevent extra-hemispheric powers such as China and Russia from gaining strategic footholds in the Western Hemisphere. The original Monroe Doctrine, presented by President Monroe in 1823, was designed to deter European interference in the Americas. The new version echoes these principles but shifts focus to contemporary threats.

Unlike in 1823, the U.S. now possesses significant military and economic leverage to enforce this policy. The administration seeks to ensure that countries like Venezuela do not become hubs for anti-U.S. activities orchestrated by foreign powers. This policy emphasizes hemispheric dominance as a means of safeguarding national security, sidestepping global interventionism.

Impact on U.S. Foreign Policy

The “Trump Corollary” marks a shift from globalism to a hemispheric focus in U.S. foreign policy. This change is expected to heighten military and intelligence activities in the Caribbean and Panama. By concentrating on regional security, the U.S. aims to block rivals from controlling strategic assets like the Panama Canal. However, this approach may also strain relations with Latin American countries that have established ties with China and Russia.

While proponents argue that this policy restores U.S. preeminence in the region, critics warn of potential isolationism and economic repercussions. The policy could pressure Latin American nations to limit their partnerships with Asia, leading to diplomatic tensions.

Expert Opinions and Future Outlook

Supporters of the “Trump Corollary” view it as a rational defense strategy aligned with the original doctrine’s intent to protect the Western Hemisphere. They argue it’s a necessary response to modern geopolitical challenges. On the other hand, critics highlight the risks of ignoring Latin America’s economic diversification and suggest that such a policy may be futile in a globally interconnected world.

The New Monroe Doctrine: We Ain’t Got Nothin’ to Do With Ithttps://t.co/FCRvFV11zU

— PJ Media Updates (@PJMediaUpdates) January 3, 2026

As the policy unfolds, its effectiveness will depend on diplomatic engagements and the ability to balance regional influence with global trade dynamics. The U.S. aims to assert its sovereignty and protect its interests without overextending its reach, a delicate balance that echoes the challenges of the original Monroe Doctrine.