Megyn Kelly Cut Ties on Air

Microphone in soundproof studio with On Air sign.

A public fallout between Megyn Kelly and Ben Shapiro reveals deeper divides in conservative media.

Story Snapshot

Megyn Kelly ends her friendship with Ben Shapiro over public criticism.
Shapiro labeled Kelly a “coward” during the TPUSA AmericaFest.
The conflict reflects broader tensions over Israel and antisemitism in conservative circles.
Kelly accuses Shapiro and Bari Weiss of inflaming antisemitism accusations.

Megyn Kelly and Ben Shapiro’s Friendship Ends

At Turning Point USA’s AmericaFest 2025, tensions between Megyn Kelly and Ben Shapiro reached a boiling point. Shapiro publicly criticized Kelly, calling her a “coward” for not explicitly condemning Candace Owens’ conspiracy theories regarding Charlie Kirk’s murder. This public denouncement marked a dramatic end to their friendship, which had been documented through a series of texts affirming their strong bond, exchanged just days before the event. Kelly, in response, declared that she no longer considers Shapiro a friend.

Conservative Media Divided Over Israel and Antisemitism

The fallout between Kelly and Shapiro is emblematic of a larger fracture within conservative media, centered around the discourse on Israel and antisemitism. Candace Owens’ increasingly critical stance on Israel has put her at odds with figures like Shapiro and Bari Weiss, who have been vocal in their pro-Israel positions. Owens’ controversial remarks following Charlie Kirk’s murder have further inflamed these tensions, drawing criticism from Shapiro and others. This has led to an intra-right debate about the boundaries of acceptable discourse on such sensitive topics.

Kelly has publicly accused Shapiro and Weiss of “making antisemites” by aggressively policing speech related to Israel and Gaza, thus alienating ordinary conservatives. She argues that their approach may inadvertently foster antisemitism by silencing legitimate debate. This accusation underscores the complex dynamics at play, where free speech and the policing of antisemitism intersect in contentious ways.

Implications for the Conservative Movement

The public rift between Kelly and Shapiro highlights the challenges facing the conservative movement as it navigates these divisive issues. The inability to reconcile differences over Israel and antisemitism reflects a broader ideological split that could have lasting implications. While Shapiro maintains a strong stance against anything he deems antisemitic, Kelly and others argue for a more open dialogue without fear of excommunication from the conservative fold.

This conflict also raises questions about the power dynamics within conservative media. Shapiro’s influence, bolstered by his platform at The Daily Wire, allows him to shape the narrative and potentially ostracize those who do not align with his views. However, Kelly, with her independent platforms, continues to command a significant audience, challenging Shapiro’s gatekeeping role.

The feud has not only personal but also professional implications, as it reflects the ongoing struggle for ideological dominance within conservative circles. As the movement grapples with these divisions, the outcome of this dispute could reshape alliances and influence future discourse.