Federal Judge Upholds Iowa’s Right to Verify Voter Citizenship Status

Voting booths with American flags and "Vote" signs.

A federal judge in Iowa upholds the state’s right to verify voter citizenship, allowing officials to challenge the validity of ballots from potential non-citizens in a ruling that emphasizes election integrity.

At a Glance

  • Federal Judge Stephen Locher ruled Iowa can challenge potential non-citizen voters while maintaining voting access for naturalized citizens
  • Iowa officials claim about 250 non-citizens are registered to vote, based on state transportation data
  • Voting as a non-citizen in federal elections is a felony with serious penalties
  • The ruling allows for a provisional ballot system rather than immediate voter removal
  • Governor Kim Reynolds and state officials support the measure as protecting election integrity

Judge Upholds Iowa’s Voter Citizenship Verification Process

In a significant ruling, Federal Judge Stephen Locher has affirmed Iowa’s authority to safeguard election integrity through voter citizenship verification. The decision allows state officials to validate the citizenship status of approximately 2,176 registered voters who previously identified as non-citizens to state agencies. This move comes as Iowa’s Secretary of State Paul Pate reports that about 250 non-citizens remain on voter rolls, underscoring the importance of this verification process.

The ruling establishes a balanced approach that aims to protect both election integrity and the rights of legitimate voters. Under this system, suspected non-citizens can cast provisional ballots and verify their citizenship status, ensuring that no eligible voter is unnecessarily disenfranchised. This process aligns with federal election law requirements and provides due process while preventing unauthorized voting.

State Officials Praise Decision as Victory for Election Integrity

Iowa’s Republican officials, including Governor Kim Reynolds and Attorney General Brenna Bird, have lauded the court’s decision as a crucial step in maintaining the integrity of the state’s elections. The ruling allows the state to challenge potential non-citizen voters while still providing a path for legitimate voters to cast their ballots.

“Today’s ruling is a victory for election integrity,” Iowa governor Kim Reynolds, a Republican, said. “In Iowa, while we encourage all citizens to vote, we will enforce the law and ensure those votes aren’t canceled out by the illegal vote of a non-citizen.”

Secretary of State Paul Pate emphasized the importance of balancing voter participation with preventing ineligible voting. The ruling supports his office’s efforts to maintain accurate voter rolls while providing safeguards for naturalized citizens who may be incorrectly flagged.

Concerns and Safeguards for Naturalized Citizens

While the ruling has been celebrated by state officials, concerns have been raised about its potential impact on recently naturalized citizens. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) expressed disappointment, fearing that the decision could lead to the disenfranchisement of eligible voters who have recently obtained citizenship.

“U.S. elections are for U.S. citizens, and ensuring only eligible voters participate in Iowa’s election process is essential to protecting the integrity of the vote. The role of Iowa Secretary of State requires balance – ensuring that on one hand, every eligible voter is able to cast their ballot while also ensuring that only eligible voters participate in Iowa elections. Both of these are critical components to Iowa election integrity.” Pate said.

To address these concerns, the ruling includes provisions that allow naturalized citizens to present documentation to cast regular ballots. Additionally, local election officials retain discretion in reviewing individual cases, ensuring that challenges are not applied indiscriminately.

Implications for Future Elections

This ruling sets a precedent that could influence similar efforts in other states to maintain voter roll accuracy. It follows a U.S. Supreme Court decision that allowed Virginia to purge its voter registration rolls, indicating a broader trend towards stricter voter verification processes.

As the 2024 elections approach, the implementation of this ruling will be closely watched. While supporters argue it’s a necessary step to prevent voter fraud, critics will be monitoring its effects to ensure it doesn’t inadvertently suppress legitimate votes. The balance between maintaining election integrity and protecting voting rights remains a contentious issue, likely to shape electoral policies across the nation in the coming years.

Sources:

  1. Judge rules Iowa can challenge validity of hundreds of ballots from potential noncitizens
  2. Judge upholds state guidance to challenge ballots of potential noncitizens
  3. Judge Allows Iowa to Challenge Voters It Suspects of Being Noncitizens
  4. Biden judge rules that Iowa can check ballots of potential noncitizens in loss for ACLU

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR