Trump Admin Reshapes Title IX Rules: Major Changes for Student-Athletes

Newspaper headline: "Change is coming!" with coffee.

The Trump administration reverses Biden-era NIL guidelines, impacting student-athletes and transgender participation in college sports.

Key Takeaways

Trump administration rescinds Biden-era guidance on NIL compensation and Title IX compliance
Biden guidance required equitable distribution of NIL earnings between men’s and women’s programs
Trump administration deems Biden guidance overly burdensome and lacking legal justification
Change impacts revenue-sharing models and potential gender equity in college athletics
Trump signs executive order banning transgender participation in women’s sports

Trump Administration Overturns Biden’s NIL Guidelines

The Department of Education under the Trump administration has rescinded guidance issued during the Biden presidency regarding Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) compensation and Title IX compliance. This move marks a significant shift in policy affecting college athletes and the distribution of NIL earnings.

The Biden administration’s guidance, released just before Trump’s inauguration, had considered NIL compensation as “athletic financial assistance” that should be equitably distributed between men’s and women’s programs. This interpretation aimed to extend Title IX’s principles of gender equity to the rapidly evolving landscape of student-athlete compensation.

Trump Administration Rescinds Biden’s Title IX NIL Guidance https://t.co/G3ScT9bq3f

— SwimSwam (@swimswamnews) February 12, 2025

Legal Justification and Burden on Institutions

Craig Trainor, the acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, criticized the Biden-era guidance as lacking legal justification and placing an undue burden on educational institutions. Trainor argued that Title IX does not mandate proportional distribution of student-athlete revenues based on gender.

“Enacted over 50 years ago, Title IX says nothing about how revenue-generating athletics programs should allocate compensation among student athletes. The claim that Title IX forces schools and colleges to distribute student-athlete revenues proportionately based on gender equity considerations is sweeping and would require clear legal authority to support it. That does not exist. Accordingly, the Biden NIL guidance is rescinded.” – Craig Trainor

The Trump administration’s decision to rescind the guidance means that NIL payments no longer need to be proportional based on gender. This change aligns with the Department of Education’s stance that Title IX does not apply to student-athlete compensation in the same way it does to other forms of financial assistance.

Impact on Revenue-Sharing and Gender Equity

The rescission of the Biden guidance has significant implications for revenue-sharing models in college athletics. Under the previous guidance, schools were required to reconsider their revenue-sharing plans to comply with gender equity considerations. This often conflicted with models that favored reinvesting in high-revenue sports like football.

“The NIL guidance, rammed through by the Biden Administration in its final days, is overly burdensome, profoundly unfair, and it goes well beyond what agency guidance is intended to achieve.” – Craig Trainor

A recent court settlement, if approved, would allow colleges to share up to $20.5 million with athletes, primarily benefiting football and men’s basketball players. This settlement, coupled with the rescission of the Biden guidance, raises concerns about potential disparities in compensation between male and female athletes.

Transgender Participation in Women’s Sports

In addition to the NIL guidance reversal, the Trump administration has taken a strong stance on transgender participation in women’s sports. President Trump signed an executive order banning transgender girls and women from participating in women’s sports, further emphasizing the administration’s approach to gender issues in athletics.

The Department of Education has also called for the NCAA and other associations to address records and awards affected by transgender athletes in women’s sports. This move aligns with the administration’s broader policy considerations regarding the legality and fairness of current regulatory practices in collegiate athletics.

As these policy changes take effect, they are likely to have far-reaching consequences for student-athletes, universities, and the future of collegiate sports. The debate over gender equity, NIL compensation, and transgender participation in athletics is sure to continue as stakeholders navigate this new regulatory landscape.